<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Candy Crowley be penalized for Presidential Debate Misconduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/should-candy-crowley-be-penalized-for-presidential-debate-misconduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/should-candy-crowley-be-penalized-for-presidential-debate-misconduct/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-candy-crowley-be-penalized-for-presidential-debate-misconduct</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: janbrown</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/should-candy-crowley-be-penalized-for-presidential-debate-misconduct/comment-page-1/#comment-192109</link>
		<dc:creator>janbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=71238#comment-192109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was she wrong?  You bet she was! Punish her only if the rest of these talking media heads are! Leher was ineffectual the 1st round &amp; Schiefer won&#039;t do any better...perhaps the GOP involved in &#039;allowing&#039; these modertors should at least get a writst slap for not insisting on a &#039;qualified, non media person for at least one meting. Greta VanSuskind said she thought it worrked FOR Romney because it was such a blatant move &amp; that could well be right]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was she wrong?  You bet she was! Punish her only if the rest of these talking media heads are! Leher was ineffectual the 1st round &#038; Schiefer won&#8217;t do any better&#8230;perhaps the GOP involved in &#8216;allowing&#8217; these modertors should at least get a writst slap for not insisting on a &#8216;qualified, non media person for at least one meting. Greta VanSuskind said she thought it worrked FOR Romney because it was such a blatant move &#038; that could well be right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
