<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Strikes: Why Paul Ryan Is A Bad Choice For Veep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/08/3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/08/3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/08/3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep/comment-page-1/#comment-82102</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=64211#comment-82102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I will agree with you on Obama and everyone else around him.

I despise Obama, and everything that he&#039;s done, doing, and wants to do.

I&#039;m not some idiotic liberal, as you rudely insinuated.

I am a Conservative, and I have no problem pointing out when Republicans are not Conservatives --- and most aren&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I will agree with you on Obama and everyone else around him.</p>
<p>I despise Obama, and everything that he&#8217;s done, doing, and wants to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not some idiotic liberal, as you rudely insinuated.</p>
<p>I am a Conservative, and I have no problem pointing out when Republicans are not Conservatives &#8212; and most aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/08/3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep/comment-page-1/#comment-82096</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=64211#comment-82096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What time did I get this??  Let&#039;s see, I sat down and wrote this between 1am and the published timestamp of 2:18am EDT.  

3 words: Prove Me Wrong:  me@tjthompson.com

You want to talk about budgets and the economy?  LET&#039;S do that, shall we?

The Ryan Budget Plan has the United States financial ledger running a deficit every year for the next 30 years - only THEN will we see an annual surplus.

Further budget analysis from his voting record is not much better:
-Voted YES on TARP (2008)
-Voted YES on Economic Stimulus HR 5140 (2008)
-Voted YES on $15B bailout for GM and Chrysler. (Dec 2008)
-Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)


The Ryan Plan also addresses entitlements - specifically Medicare and Medicaid.  The problem is that there are no changes made to Medicare for 10 years, which leaves a full decade for the Medicare program to expand on it&#039;s current $83.3 TRILLION unfunded liability.

And again, to refer back to Paul Ryan&#039;s record on entitlement programs:
-Voted YES on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers. (Jun 2006)
-Voted YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks. (Oct 2008)
-Voted YES on Head Start Act (2007)


.....so please... LET&#039;S talk budgets, economy, and entitlements (which fit naturally into that mold)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What time did I get this??  Let&#8217;s see, I sat down and wrote this between 1am and the published timestamp of 2:18am EDT.  </p>
<p>3 words: Prove Me Wrong:  <a href="mailto:me@tjthompson.com">me@tjthompson.com</a></p>
<p>You want to talk about budgets and the economy?  LET&#8217;S do that, shall we?</p>
<p>The Ryan Budget Plan has the United States financial ledger running a deficit every year for the next 30 years &#8211; only THEN will we see an annual surplus.</p>
<p>Further budget analysis from his voting record is not much better:<br />
-Voted YES on TARP (2008)<br />
-Voted YES on Economic Stimulus HR 5140 (2008)<br />
-Voted YES on $15B bailout for GM and Chrysler. (Dec 2008)<br />
-Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)</p>
<p>The Ryan Plan also addresses entitlements &#8211; specifically Medicare and Medicaid.  The problem is that there are no changes made to Medicare for 10 years, which leaves a full decade for the Medicare program to expand on it&#8217;s current $83.3 TRILLION unfunded liability.</p>
<p>And again, to refer back to Paul Ryan&#8217;s record on entitlement programs:<br />
-Voted YES on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers. (Jun 2006)<br />
-Voted YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks. (Oct 2008)<br />
-Voted YES on Head Start Act (2007)</p>
<p>&#8230;..so please&#8230; LET&#8217;S talk budgets, economy, and entitlements (which fit naturally into that mold)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBo</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/08/3-strikes-why-paul-ryan-is-a-bad-choice-for-veep/comment-page-1/#comment-82046</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=64211#comment-82046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well - If your premise while very subject to interpretation is correct then it is time for Obama and his entire cabinet to resign in disgrace.  Three strikes? Hell I stopped counting at constitutional runarounds and programs designed to void our laws yet garner votes such as promoting illegal invasion of the US. 

What time did you get this Soros/Media Matters Hit piece last night? Were they on the ball or did they pick one of the prepared articles? 

LET&#039;S move the conversation to budgets and the economy...Let&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; If your premise while very subject to interpretation is correct then it is time for Obama and his entire cabinet to resign in disgrace.  Three strikes? Hell I stopped counting at constitutional runarounds and programs designed to void our laws yet garner votes such as promoting illegal invasion of the US. </p>
<p>What time did you get this Soros/Media Matters Hit piece last night? Were they on the ball or did they pick one of the prepared articles? </p>
<p>LET&#8217;S move the conversation to budgets and the economy&#8230;Let&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
