<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Socialists Bailout Buffoonery Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-57422</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46253#comment-57422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why S1789 should be voted down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09ybkkiH2Ho]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why S1789 should be voted down.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09ybkkiH2Ho" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09ybkkiH2Ho</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-57419</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46253#comment-57419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction on my post.
What the 3rd line from the bottom should say is: 
What the Post Office needs is to have HR6407    RESCINDED 
and go back to being solvent as it was before 
What a difference in meaning one word can make.

reply]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction on my post.<br />
What the 3rd line from the bottom should say is:<br />
What the Post Office needs is to have HR6407    RESCINDED<br />
and go back to being solvent as it was before<br />
What a difference in meaning one word can make.</p>
<p>reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-57413</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46253#comment-57413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USPS doesn&#039;t need a 41 Billion Dollar bailout even though the Banks and Wall got those.
In 2006 CONGRESS passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act. Sounds good, huh? Read on.The PAEA (HR6407) MANDATED that the USPS FUND 75 years of retiree health benefits in 10 years at payments of 5.5 Billion a year. Any business or government agency that would be forced to do the same would end up unable to take in additional revenue to cover 75 years of retiree health benefits. Think about this. The USPS is required to cover retiree health benefits up until 2081 paid for in 10 to a new ON BUDGET FUND the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund (PSRHBF);
What the Post Office needs is to have HR6407 and go back to being solvent as it was before when it&#039;s income matched it&#039;s expenses.
I&#039;m for voting NO on S1789 but for different reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USPS doesn&#8217;t need a 41 Billion Dollar bailout even though the Banks and Wall got those.<br />
In 2006 CONGRESS passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act. Sounds good, huh? Read on.The PAEA (HR6407) MANDATED that the USPS FUND 75 years of retiree health benefits in 10 years at payments of 5.5 Billion a year. Any business or government agency that would be forced to do the same would end up unable to take in additional revenue to cover 75 years of retiree health benefits. Think about this. The USPS is required to cover retiree health benefits up until 2081 paid for in 10 to a new ON BUDGET FUND the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund (PSRHBF);<br />
What the Post Office needs is to have HR6407 and go back to being solvent as it was before when it&#8217;s income matched it&#8217;s expenses.<br />
I&#8217;m for voting NO on S1789 but for different reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Timmons</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-6795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Timmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46253#comment-6795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed, the same could be said of your comment which would lead me to tell you that &quot;It would help if you did some research before you write.&quot; 

The author quoted the Postmaster General and has the numbers of increased borrowing the govt will take on in your name.

Perhaps you could enlighten us with your version of the facts. So far, all you&#039;ve done is say that the article is incorrect and provided no rebuttal of your own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, the same could be said of your comment which would lead me to tell you that &#8220;It would help if you did some research before you write.&#8221; </p>
<p>The author quoted the Postmaster General and has the numbers of increased borrowing the govt will take on in your name.</p>
<p>Perhaps you could enlighten us with your version of the facts. So far, all you&#8217;ve done is say that the article is incorrect and provided no rebuttal of your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed siemers</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/senate-socialists-bailout-buffoonery-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>ed siemers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46253#comment-6757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author is completely off base here. It would help if you did some research before you write. Reading his/her other articles also made me laugh. If these were any further right they&#039;d fall off the edge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author is completely off base here. It would help if you did some research before you write. Reading his/her other articles also made me laugh. If these were any further right they&#8217;d fall off the edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
