<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Number for Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/the-real-number-for-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/the-real-number-for-republicans/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-real-number-for-republicans</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/the-real-number-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=38180#comment-70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody says that about the hat.  Lucky my wife found it for me.  It gives limited credibility where none existed before.

I am liking the number I see for Santorum the last three days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody says that about the hat.  Lucky my wife found it for me.  It gives limited credibility where none existed before.</p>
<p>I am liking the number I see for Santorum the last three days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/the-real-number-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=38180#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and by the way! Nice hat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and by the way! Nice hat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/the-real-number-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=38180#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article William! I&#039;m not sure I agree with the premise. Caucus and primary voting is generally soft. People don&#039;t become really interested (unless they&#039;re political junkies like you and me) until the general election. Maybe then, when we have a clear cut nominee, the voting rates will be better. 

I agree with your last line though. We do deserve better than Obama!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article William! I&#8217;m not sure I agree with the premise. Caucus and primary voting is generally soft. People don&#8217;t become really interested (unless they&#8217;re political junkies like you and me) until the general election. Maybe then, when we have a clear cut nominee, the voting rates will be better. </p>
<p>I agree with your last line though. We do deserve better than Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
