<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santorum&#8217;s Sweep of 3 [Non-Binding] Caucuses Proves He is the Only Conservative Running?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/santorums-sweep-of-3-non-binding-caucuses-proves-he-is-the-only-conservative-running/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/santorums-sweep-of-3-non-binding-caucuses-proves-he-is-the-only-conservative-running/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=santorums-sweep-of-3-non-binding-caucuses-proves-he-is-the-only-conservative-running</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talon's Point</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/02/santorums-sweep-of-3-non-binding-caucuses-proves-he-is-the-only-conservative-running/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Talon's Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=38182#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What part of this story does &quot;non binding&quot; have relevance. Would the Romney or Gingrich supporters be proclaiming the &quot;non binding&quot; point had their candidate fared better in these races? mmmm not so much I bet. The voters in these states went to the polls (or caucuses) to voice their consciences like those in FL and SC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What part of this story does &#8220;non binding&#8221; have relevance. Would the Romney or Gingrich supporters be proclaiming the &#8220;non binding&#8221; point had their candidate fared better in these races? mmmm not so much I bet. The voters in these states went to the polls (or caucuses) to voice their consciences like those in FL and SC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
