Birther Talk
By A.F. Branco on Feb 01, 2012 in Political Cartoons
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Birther Talk”.
Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends
Hilarious, Tony! I’m no Birth-er, but this is definitely a LOL-er.
Excellent
Thank you!
Hilarious! One of my favorite subjects Tony! Thank you!!! I am so anxious to see if Obama will be making more history for being the first faux president of the United States of America! Well done mixing the immigration issue with Obama’s fake birth certificate!!! BRILLIANT! LMAO
Thank you Corkie.. I thought you might like this one.
Actually, President Chester Arthur was the first faux president. His father was not naturalized until many (13?) years after his birth. Knowing this disqualified him from office, he had most of the records of his early life destroyed.
This significant difference between Arthur & Sotero is that the information about Arthur was significantly concealed until after he completed his term. A very good read on this is at http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/06/urgent-historical-breakthrough-proof-chester-arthur-concealed-he-was-a-british-subject-at-birth/ .
With Sotero, it is almost as if it does not matter that he does not meet the criteria for a natural-born citizen (as his father was never & never had any intent to be a citizen of the USA) no matter where he was born.
In this case, the judiciary has determined not to judge faithfully to the Constitution on what a defines citizenship in the USA, thereby invalidating the requirements of the Constitution.