<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNBC Debate: Your Money, Your Vote, Perry&#039;s Senior Moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 04:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=26412#comment-1651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Ron Paul not at the debate? I don&#039;t see his name anywhere in this post..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Ron Paul not at the debate? I don&#8217;t see his name anywhere in this post..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hays</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=26412#comment-1650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always thought Newt was electable.  Who has been telling us he&#039;s not all these years?  Why it&#039;s been our wonderful, objective, pure as the wind-driven snow press of course, with absolutely no ax to grind whatsoever, right?

If we really want to talk electability here, picture each one of these candidates in a 1 on 1 debate with Obama - Lincoln/Douglas style or otherwise - and which one would absolutely clean his clock?  Pretty clear to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always thought Newt was electable.  Who has been telling us he&#8217;s not all these years?  Why it&#8217;s been our wonderful, objective, pure as the wind-driven snow press of course, with absolutely no ax to grind whatsoever, right?</p>
<p>If we really want to talk electability here, picture each one of these candidates in a 1 on 1 debate with Obama &#8211; Lincoln/Douglas style or otherwise &#8211; and which one would absolutely clean his clock?  Pretty clear to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Redman</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/cnbc-debate-your-money-your-vote-perrys-senior-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=26412#comment-1649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All in all it was a pretty decent debate. (IMO) Yes, that was despite Jim Cramer giving off the appearance of being a mentally deranged attention seeker whom should not ever have been anywhere near this debate. While Perry did have what only can be described as a huge brain fart,  heck, Obama has had them 24/7 for over 3 years now, and nobody in the media brings that up much.  Newt was very good, Huntsman surprised me with some solid answers, and Herman Cain did quite well in describing what this country needs to turn it around in 2013.

I too am starting to really appreciate the experience and straight-forwardness that Newt brings to these debates and  which he could bring to the White House in 2013.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all it was a pretty decent debate. (IMO) Yes, that was despite Jim Cramer giving off the appearance of being a mentally deranged attention seeker whom should not ever have been anywhere near this debate. While Perry did have what only can be described as a huge brain fart,  heck, Obama has had them 24/7 for over 3 years now, and nobody in the media brings that up much.  Newt was very good, Huntsman surprised me with some solid answers, and Herman Cain did quite well in describing what this country needs to turn it around in 2013.</p>
<p>I too am starting to really appreciate the experience and straight-forwardness that Newt brings to these debates and  which he could bring to the White House in 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
