<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 of 12 Members of the Super Committee Received Bundled Cash from Lobbyists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/5-of-12-members-of-the-super-committee-received-bundled-cash-from-lobbyists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/5-of-12-members-of-the-super-committee-received-bundled-cash-from-lobbyists/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-of-12-members-of-the-super-committee-received-bundled-cash-from-lobbyists</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoChangeNoLeadershipFromObama</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/5-of-12-members-of-the-super-committee-received-bundled-cash-from-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>NoChangeNoLeadershipFromObama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=27981#comment-1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By walking away from Simpson-Bowles, Obama created the need for the super committee, which had no chance of success.

Obama himself appointed Bowles and Simpson to his National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.

The talking point now is that Simpson-Bowles is nearly identical to the super committee Democratic plan.

If that is the case, then why did Obama walk away from Simpson-Bowles?

Obama apparently wants no decrease in the out-of-control spending, regardless of whether it is tax or revenue in increases proffered by Republicans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By walking away from Simpson-Bowles, Obama created the need for the super committee, which had no chance of success.</p>
<p>Obama himself appointed Bowles and Simpson to his National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.</p>
<p>The talking point now is that Simpson-Bowles is nearly identical to the super committee Democratic plan.</p>
<p>If that is the case, then why did Obama walk away from Simpson-Bowles?</p>
<p>Obama apparently wants no decrease in the out-of-control spending, regardless of whether it is tax or revenue in increases proffered by Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
