Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends
nielszoo { Once again the ignorance of the Left never ceases to amaze. Let's just make up a law, based in fiction with a required date for... } โ May 20, 5:03 PM
Concerned { Seems like the links to find protest site information are disabled. Please get your stuff together. } โ May 20, 3:56 PM
By walking away from Simpson-Bowles, Obama created the need for the super committee, which had no chance of success.
Obama himself appointed Bowles and Simpson to his National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.
The talking point now is that Simpson-Bowles is nearly identical to the super committee Democratic plan.
If that is the case, then why did Obama walk away from Simpson-Bowles?
Obama apparently wants no decrease in the out-of-control spending, regardless of whether it is tax or revenue in increases proffered by Republicans.