John Dummett and Liberty Legal vs. “Conservative” Media and Politicians

By | October 29, 2011

World Net Daily has just published a story involving John Albert Dummett and his quest to have Barack Obama declared ineligible to serve as President of the United States of America.  The suit centers around the “natural born citizen” status requirement as stated in the Constitution, the Naturalization Act of 1790, and an 1875 Supreme Court decision, Minor vs. Happersett (88 US 162).  This link will take you to the story for all of the details:.

John has teamed up with the Liberty Legal Foundation in this effort to remove what I see as one of the most insidious attempts to subvert the Constitution in this nation’s 235 year history.  The article points out that John has been given standing to sue by the 9th Circuit Court, the most liberal in the nation.  If that bastion of liberal thinking agrees with John there must be something to the case.  Where there is smoke there is fire and this fire is hot.

It has long been known that Obama is not eligible but was certified by Nancy Pelosi and other federal and state officials in what this writer sees as a totally unlawful and treasonous disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America and We the People.  The long form birth certificate issued by the White House is such a poor forgery that I can see it and I am not a computer forensics expert.

If the title of this article surprises you I can explain.  I expect the Democrats, especially the far left like Obama, Pelosi, and their ilk, along with the lame stream media, to ridicule and criticize this action.  That can be expected by anyone with ability to reason.  However, it is surprising to me how many “conservative” politicians and pundits dismiss this case, and those cases leading up to this one as nonsense.

I was listening to the Neal Boortz radio show this morning and heard sit-in host Eric Erickson ridiculing anyone who agreed with the ineligibility position and calling us all “nut cases”.  He went on a long diatribe describing “native born citizen” and attributed the parameters he stated to “natural born citizen”.  There is a great deal of confusion about this although I don’t know why.  I don’t have a college education and I understand the parameters just fine.

Other “conservative” media pundits, including Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, have dismissed the “birther” stand as nonsense also.  Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala), a 15 year member of the United States Senate, also dismissed the eligibility question stating that the State Department said Obama was eligible and the Constitution has nothing to do with eligibility to run for president.  HUH??? Apparently Sen. Sessions, in addition to not reading legislation passing his way, has also not read or does not understand the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold and defend. That problem seems to be rampant in both parties in Washington.

My question is: Why do they dismiss this so off-handedly?  I can’t begin to imagine how so many “conservative” pundits and politicians can dismiss a decision against Obama by an extremely liberal circuit court.  This decision could not only prevent Obama from running again, it could lead to everything he has signed being nullified.  Obamacare gone; czars gone; Elena Kagan gone; Sonia Sotomayor gone; what is there to not like about this?  On the surface this doesn’t make one bit of sense to me.

I think, however, that I can answer the question quite easily.  It has recently come to my attention that Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico, thereby bringing his eligibility into question.  However, as it relates to Romney, his father’s birthplace is the least of my objections.  Mr. Erickson also brought up Marco Rubio, the heir-apparent to the Republican throne, as another person mentioned as not eligible.  I have researched Mr. Rubio and found him to be ineligible also.  I have written about the Rubio case more than once.  The sad thing is that I really like Marco Rubio and everything he stands for.  Even though I respect and admire him, and his positions, my loyalty is to the Constitution first.  I have also looked into Bobby Jindal, another man I admire very much, but guess what.

The question here is: Do we follow the Constitution when it is convenient or do we live by its tenets completely?  I understand that the politicians have strayed far from the original letter and intent of the document and find it easier to do what is in their best interests rather than follow what our founding fathers laid down as the guideposts for our nation.  I don’t need any further explanations about what is wrong with America today.  We the People do not matter, power matters.  Both parties fight over who will control government with no regard for the people they are supposed to be SERVING.

Both parties have taken young Muslim men who can’t count to ten with both hands in front of them, set them up with fake bombs and targets, and then arrested them in the name of “Homeland Security”.  I think they call that entrapment!!  Officials hail themselves as doing a wonderful job protecting our homeland but are they?  Not in my book.  They break their arms patting themselves on the back for playing poor idiots as patsies.  The only two attacks I know about that weren’t planned by federal agents, the shoe bomber and the underwear bomber, were thwarted by private citizens alert to something amiss and the incompetence of the would-be attackers.

This isn’t only about Barack Obama; it is about politics and the corruption that permeates every pore of it.  This is about We the People once again gaining control of our future and restoring America as the “shining city on a hill” described by John Winthrop in the 1700’s.  It is about honor, integrity, and the rule of law.  It is about following the blueprint given to us by those who fought valiantly and defeated the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Solyndra scandal is not the sole property of the Democrat Party.  Under Republican rule we had Enron, questionable money going to Halliburton, and on and on. Political corruption and vote buying has been a part of Washington as long as I have been around and I date back to the middle of the last century (1950).  Cronyism has long been the font of the ruling class, making sure those who give money to politicians of either party get their money back with interest.

Our forefathers, the men who wrote two of the greatest documents ever written, pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to establish the United States of America.  Generations of men and women have fought and died to preserve this nation.  We have strayed so far from what they established with the help of Divine Providence, that they would not recognize this nation today.

John Dummett is a common man, not a politician, not a wealthy wanta-be looking for a title to make him a legend in his own mind as most of the ruling class tends to be.  His desire is to live by the Constitution and bring this country back to its design.  I support him, as do many other “commoners”, the “country class” of America.  We have been ruled by the Ivy League know-it-alls for much too long.  Our nation has turned into a quagmire of evil, increasing poverty, class envy, and divisiveness by those who seek to rule rather than govern.  Both parties enrich their friends while promising We the People the moon.  You know the old saying, “divide and conquer”.

The goal of John Albert Dummett, Liberty Legal Foundation, and many common American citizens is to restore our nation to what it was designed to be, government OF the People, BY the People, and FOR the People.  God and our founding fathers gave us a wonderful way of life, full of freedom, full of liberty, full of promise, and what have we done with it?

It is up to We the People to take our country back.  Unfortunately we will have to fight a war on two fronts.  We have to fight the liberals, George Soros, and the “Occupy Wall Street” morons who aren’t smart enough to put two sentences together, as well as the so-called conservative media and politicians who do not want to give up their gravy train to those of us “too stupid to know what is good for us”.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the ruling elites are all around us.  They are found on both sides of the political aisle and until we get enough common people into office to blunt their agenda we are in danger of dictatorship and slavery.  Remember, it was George W. Bush and a Republican Congress that gave us the Patriot Act, a misnamed law if I ever saw one.  In the name of protecting us they turned the noose of slavery one notch tighter.

John Dummett and the Liberty Legal Foundation are working for us, the common citizen of all colors, all economic categories, and all ethnic groups.  They are trying to restore We the people as the arbiters of freedom, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  We need to support them.

I submit this in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, in faith, with the responsibility given to me by Almighty God to honor His work and not let it die from neglect.

 

Bob Russell
Claremore, Oklahoma
October 29, 2011

 

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

0 thoughts on “John Dummett and Liberty Legal vs. “Conservative” Media and Politicians

  1. WillofLa

    My burning question for years has been, “Why is it that these men in high places cannot be arrested for the serious crimes they have committed?” “Why is it so easy to arrest (on TV) of these men who are CEO’s of major corporations, but seemingly impossible to arrest men as high, and actually lower in position like Barney Frank who has never run a corporation or anykind of business or a single damn thing that would be a job he would have to show some responsibility for, and put these people behind bars for 50 years?”

    Those are my questions. Why is it that we can’t see some of the high level crooks and corrupt politician’s be put behind bars? Where is the FBI? Why aren’t they doing their job? Why are we seeing Obama arrested for committing crimes against the people of the United States in all the crimes he’s committed? My own Congressman has written me recently and stated himself that Obama has committed many crimes since he’s been in office. Well, damn it man!! Why is somebody in a high office in the government so far above the law that they honestly believe they are exempt from arrest? Where in the Constitution does it say that men in the government can commit crimes and not have to worry about being suspected of anything?

    Can anyone answer my questions? I can’t get anyone in the government to stick their necks out and give me a straight answer. Write your answer right here on this thread so we can all see it. Also to, why isn’t Mr. Dummett able to call for the arrest of Obama and hold him pending grand jury hearing? Matdoff was arrested, ENRON executives were arrested and held pending grand jury investigations, World Com CEO’s were arrested, all these men who hold just a high an office were arrested, why not somebody at least Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Pelosi for her conspiricy to overthrow the Constitution with her collusion with that other former Congresswoman who was holding some government office, or maybe she was a Congresswoman who was over some committee, who Pelosi was working with to “deem the bill passed” when Pelosi couldn’t get enough Democrat votes to legally pass the ObamaCare bill. Remember all that? Wasn’t Pelosi committing a crime then, along with that woman? They were committing conspiricy to over ride the Constitution to get this unConstitutional bill passed, “deemed passed”?

  2. WillofLa

    I believe and support all that Mr. Russell wrote, including the FACT that Obama is a foreigner who was picked to run the country illegally by permission of the RNC, and the DNC, leadership of both Parties, Pelosi, and everyone knew who Obama was and what he was. And apparently they agreed with the cover up, and stopped the FBI from stopping Obama from being a candidate since it’s their duty to do so. They didn’t, and apparently someone at the top told everyone to keep their mouths shut about the matter, and if they had done the cover up good enough the public won’t find out about Obama. Obama has all his school records that would show his place of birth, being that he had to have had a foreign passport to be able to go to Pakistan with his room mate, because Pakistan was off limits to American’s due to the war going on there with India. But Obama’s school records are locked up at the Dean’s office safe, or the safe in the library at the University of Illinois in Chicago. The Dean being a good friend of Obama’s. And he was told not to let anyone see those records unless they have signed letter from Obama saying so. Obama was the only candidate who didn’t turn over all his records and birth certificate as is the law just for the office of the President in the Constitution. Obama not only didn’t turn over his records, he refused to do so right to the faces of the FBI. Obama couldn’t even pass the FBI background check, so how is it that he is President?

    I know most all of you already know all that, and I didn’t write it to just remind people of what is already common knowledge. I wanted to go over some of the cover up just to show that we are being taken for a ride by men who claim to be in either Party, when they are not in any party. They are the men who are in control of everything, and will remain in control of everything until we take it away from them by force according to our right as given in the Constitution “to remove the government that is out of control and replace it with a Constitutional government”. Until there is someone who can organize the taking back of our government, any talk of taking it back by mere vote is off track here. Those in the government also control the vote process. Otherwise how could ACORN get away with so many offences of cheating and fraud that was proven by the FBI in 2006 and especially in 2008 when ACORN was flaunting their fraud in the face of the FBI and they were prohibited from doing anything about it. More than half of the Democrats in office shouldn’t even be there. We already have lost the country and the only reason why we’re not all in concentration camps is because the Socialists need our money from working. They cannot do what they do by printing all the money, some of it has to be made honestly.

    Want to take the government back, go to real war against those who are doing all this to us, and hope that you can talk enough of the military to be on our side and bring their weapons and maybe we might have a chance unless those who are in power don’t call in foreign troops to helpt them defeat us. And they have already set that up here in America back in the 80’s. I saw the evidence of how the powers that be laid out our roads, streets, and highways to make it easy for the foreign troops to find their way around the country, with my own eyes right out by where I lived at that time. It scared the hell out of me just to think how far ahead of us those in power are. Don’t think they haven’t already thought of what would happen if we acted on our Constitutional right to throw them out and replace them with a Constitutional government. And they have been acting on it already for decades. Where are we in preparing to take our government back from the enemy? Voting them out of office? Good luck with that.