Home >> Featured >> Running Theme in GOP Debate – Choice

Running Theme in GOP Debate – Choice

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Running Theme in GOP Debate – Choice”.


Looking for more great news and commentary from a conservative perpective? Visit our homepage!

About R. Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the Sr. Managing Editor of Conservative Daily News. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Anomalous Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and

No comments

  1. I strongly support and back the 10th Amendment. I made sure that my state was one of the one’s who voted to stand on the 10th Amendment when it came to opposing ObamaCare, and reject the government’s intrusion on our health care decisions, and where we go for health care to be between us and our doctors, not the government. There are a lot of doctors in my city. Many are specialists, but many more are GP’s. I don’t have to stay with one doctor. I am literally free to go to any doctor I want, or believe can help me. As a vet I can even go to the VA if I “choose” to do so. But as far as the government deciding where and who I see to help me with my health care problem’s, the government is ONE choice, not many. Obama says the health care bill would give American’s more choice when added to the choices we already have. But that is a lie.

    America has always been a country of choice. That is the foundation that our nation was formed by, and that is you can come here and start a business that sells the same kind of product as another business that is already here. And in the process you are allowed to sell your idea of that product freely and without any interference from the government. Well, that’s how it’s supposed to be. The Socialists are the ones who don’t want choice because that breeds freedom. Liberals don’t like freedom and liberty because when people are free they don’t need any help from the government, and liberals are all about the government controling everything and that is Communism. So if you want choice get rid of the Communists because they are the ones who are trying to take choice away from everyone in the country. That is only if you oppose what they stand for. If you are with the Democrats then you have all the choice you need, but only what is offered within the government. If you need money, there are only two or three choices you have with the government, Social Security benefits, Social Security Disability, SSI, or Welfare. That’s it. But it you are free you have as many companies to choose from for a job as there are. They have as many different kinds of work conditions, they have as many different pay choices as they have, and there are as many different choices of how much you will be paid and promotions and company benefits as there are companies to choose from. Now, that’s choice.

    Liberals don’t want you to have that many choices. They also believe in having “too much freedom” to. What the hell is that, “too much freedom”? I don’t know. I can’t even figure out what that is, “too much freedom”. Does it mean that you have to many choices when you are that free, to be able to go around and put in your resume to all those places is a waste of time and gas? I don’t know. You are to free and you can live in squawler if you want, and it can look like those programs on TV that we see where people are “hoarding” and are having to crawl over bags of all the stuff they are free to buy? You can buy all the dope you want to the point where you end up in a hospital? And what, you wouldn’t be able to do that if you were in some kind of confined, fenced up, complex where you can’t go anywhere, buy anything you’re not told to buy, and can’t use as much energy you want to buy?

    Is freedom the limits on what kind of light bulbs the liberals claim are harming the planet? They claim that using a certain kind of light bulb causes the power plants to generate more power, and when the generators are turning that fast they put out more heat to burn those kinds of bulbs, and in doing so puts to much heat in the air which causes the weather to change from what it would be if that area was cool, and the changing of the weather causes more weather changes in areas of the world that don’t need it(and they can blame us for somebody else’s weather?) is reason to take those freedoms away from us? Yes, because Maurice Strong says that we are liable for the weather in other parts of the world because he believes that what we produce here in America causes the weather to change in some other part of the world, and that’s wrong? How can he figure that out to show how what goes on here in America can change what goes on in some other part of the world. Well, that is partly true, but not in the way he believes it is. When the choice is to use your own resources without regard to what happens in some dirty little African country, then I choose using our own resources!