Gov. Perry – Welcome to Your Past

During my misspent youth, I was a Democrat. Consequently, when I started my political consulting firm I wanted to be true to my mistaken convictions, so I only worked for Democrat clients.
[Note: Now that I’m a Republican who has seen the error of my ways, I often find myself trying to rationalize my membership in the party of debt, dependency and degeneracy by telling people I was a “conservative Democrat.” This is not all that uncommon among those of us who have seen the light and puts me in some pretty august company.
Recently I was watching a rerun of ‘Booknotes’ with Gertrude Himmelfarb — now a respected historian and neo–conservative, but in her youth a Trotskyite, which — for those of you suffering from recent history instruction in public schools — is a variety of Communist. When asked how she made the ideological journey from Trotsky to Reagan, it warmed my heart when explained that she was always a pretty conservative Trotskyite.]
In 1990 I found myself working as media consultant for Tom McRae who was Bill Clinton’s last gubernatorial primary opponent in Arkansas.
At that time Clinton was eight to ten years into his affair with Gennifer Flowers, had played jack–in–the–box with Paula Jones, reportedly used the state troopers to ferry women and was generally known as someone you wouldn’t leave unsupervised with your college–age daughter.
Yet our TV spots featured none of this lurid material for the simple reason that, regardless of the truth, the rumors were old news to voters and reporters. Clinton had been re–elected previously when Flowers was just starting to bloom. The fact that she had now taken root, along with a complete inventory of other women, was simply not a factor as he sought his fifth term.
Instead, our spots were built around “It’s time for a change” and highlighted the fact Clinton was just going through the motions while preparing to run for president. Our woefully underfunded campaign held Clinton to a meager 54 percent.
Two years later Clinton was in for a rude surprise during the New Hampshire Presidential Primary. Rumors he thought dead and buried arose in the form of tapes secretly recorded by Flowers and played for the news media.
Why was his old squeeze from the Ozarks suddenly relevant? Simple, Clinton changed the scope of his campaigning, from statewide candidate in Arkansas to nationwide candidate and new voters were unaware of his randy streak. These voters were encountering information that he thought was safely behind him and Clinton was caught unprepared. Overcoming the shock required a comprehensive campaign of lies to a gullible news media that just barely saved his campaign.
The same phenomenon is being repeated today — minus the lies and the lingerie.
Texas Governor Rick Perry is encountering past issues he previously overcame. If Perry had been content to stay in Texas and run for governor, US Senator or Congress the forced HPV vaccinations for schoolgirls and in–state college tuition for children of illegal aliens would have been non–issues.
This is because winning an election, similar to baptism, washes one clean of all past political sins. Where Christian baptism differs from elections is Christ doesn’t care about geography. You’re just as clean in Austin as you are in Arlington. But in politics absolution doesn’t travel across the border.
In Florida and elsewhere conservative Republicans are appalled at Perry’s executive decision to require schoolgirls to be vaccinated for a disease that comes through sexual activity and his signature on a law that grants in–state college tuition to the children of illegal aliens.
Perry appears to be appalled that voters have found out.
His debate answers are awkward and off–message for Republicans. He says his decision with regard to HPV vaccinations was wrong and he would not do it again. So far so good, but then he rationalizes by saying it would save lives. So would requiring every citizen of Texas to wear a ballistic vest when leaving the house, but it would not be a conservative policy.
His most recent answer to the tuition controversy only served to drive his poll numbers down. Telling opponents of granting special privileges to children of illegals that they “don’t…have a heart” is simply stupid. Democrats are the land of “follow your feelings,” Republicans prefer to follow the rule of law.
If Perry’s answers don’t improve his campaign will be the second bubble to burst, following that of Rep. Michelle Bachmann. But either way, he serves as an instructive lesson for politicians who are looking to expand their political horizons in the future.
Michael R. Shannon is a public relations and advertising consultant with corporate, government and political experience around the globe. He is a dynamic and entertaining keynote speaker. He can be reached at michael-shannon@comcast.net.

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Rich Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the editor-in-chief of Conservative Daily News and the president of Bald Eagle Media, LLC. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Bald Eagle Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. “In Florida and elsewhere conservative Republicans are appalled at Perry’s executive decision to require schoolgirls to be vaccinated for a disease that comes through sexual activity and his signature on a law that grants in–state college tuition to the children of illegal aliens.”

    Yawn. Maybe if conservative Republicans could focus on current issues like the economy and jobs, or the traditional values like prolife, small gov, & fiscal conservatism instead of being led around by the nose in an echo chamber that makes no reference to them at all, it would be helpful.

    Yes, the “disease”, i.e. *CANCER* comes via sexual activity. The vax itself must precede the sexual activity or it is rendered ineffective. The utter apathy involved in being unable to fill out an easily accessed online form to *OPT-OUT* – or make any reference to its existence when writing on the subject – is beyond me, as is the fact that not one of the articles I’ve read ever mentions that multiple medical organizations *to this day* recommend that vax. If your girl doesn’t have sex until she’s married – *it still protects her*.
    And this is all aside from the basic question – is a ‘mandate’ with an ‘opt-out’ really even a mandate? It wasn’t even conditional. All one had to do was say ‘No’. Oh, the horror of it all…

    Re: calling those who have issue with in-state tuition – that was an un-forced error on Perry’s part. Which he’s since walked back, but that’s beside the point. No question his debate performances are poor. But those two things do not summarize Perry for me, nor do they preclude my vote any more than Obama or Mitt’s speaking skills buy it. Both men are much better in that area than Perry – but that’s not good enough for me.

    Rubio and Jeb Bush both happen to agree with Perry (& the majority of Texans) on in-state tuition – shall we throw them under the bus along with him? Clearly this decade old law is a deal-breaker for our current crop of pure conservatives. So let’s be real thorough – let’s make sure we excorciate every candidate equally, because the rest of their truly stellar records just DO NOT MATTER, and they’re ALL lying RINOS.

    Right?

    1. “The utter apathy involved in being unable to fill out an easily accessed online form to *OPT-OUT* – or make any reference to its existence when writing on the subject ”

      The form you speak of isn’t as easy as a mouse click or two. It requires much more than that, and expires every two years. Making the “mandate” hard to get out of.

      Instead of speaking on the merits of an opt-out you have no clue about, why don’t you focus on why this issue is important… like repealing obamacare, that will be far worse than mandating STD prevention shots to pre-teens.

  2. It dumfounds me. In 2001, I retired after 20 years of serving in the USN. Myself, nor my children qualify for free tuition. How does the Governor justify giving it to children of illegal aliens, all of which have broken the very laws I was putting my life in danger to protect?

Back to top button