Proposed Natural Gas Act: Dead on Arrival in Washington

By | July 28, 2011

NEW YORK, July 27, 2011 — Senior energy executive Karl W. Miller is a major supporter in establishing a comprehensive energy plan for the U.S.

However, Mr. Miller has advised numerous times, government handouts do not work, never have and never will. The capital markets must make investment decisions based upon supply, demand, price points and other factors. Natural gas is no different; producers can’t “jam natural gas” down the consumer’s throat by forced consumption, media blitzes, and government taxes (subsidies on natural gas vehicles, etc.).

The following statement has been issued by Mr. Miller:

What Is the Natural Gas Act?

The essential elements of the failed “Pickens Plan” were incorporated into the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act, or the NAT GAS Act, which was introduced by groups of senators and representatives in the previous two Congresses. The legislation would jump-start the use of natural-gas-powered heavy-duty trucks by giving tax incentives and subsidies to purchasers and manufacturers of natural-gas-powered vehicles.

A bill promoting natural gas vehicles was first introduced in 2008 by archconservative Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK). The first NAT GAS Act was soon introduced by a bipartisan coalition including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and conservative champion Tom Coburn (R-OK).

Chief among those who are pushing conservatives in Congress to drop their support for the NAT GAS Act are the Koch brothers. Charles Koch has been loudly vocalizing his opposition to the “misguided suggestion that the natural-gas industry should receive enormous new subsidies.”

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) has been leading the conservative attacks against the NAT GAS Act. Rep. Pompeo maintains that he is opposed to “using taxpayer dollars to support targeted interests within the energy sector.”

The new efforts to oppose the NAT GAS Act are paying off, convincing co-sponsors to take the unusual step of publicly withdrawing their support for a bill that they previously cosponsored. Reps. Tim Griffin (R-AR) and Glenn Thompson (R-PA) withdrew their names as sponsors on May 26, joining Reps. Todd Akin (R-MO) and Steve Pearce (R-NM), who dropped their backing earlier in the month. Rep. Thompson had also been a co-sponsor of the 2009 version of the bill.

To see organizations who oppose investments in natural gas vehicles and their statements against “subsidies” for natural gas, go to: http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/522236-karl-w-miller/198849-proposed-natural-gas-act-dead-on-arrival-in-washington

Source: NEAH

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends