<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stephanopoulos The Mobster&#8217;s Veiled Threat To Michele Bachmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/06/stephanopoulos-the-mobsters-veiled-threat-to-michele-bachmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/06/stephanopoulos-the-mobsters-veiled-threat-to-michele-bachmann/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stephanopoulos-the-mobsters-veiled-threat-to-michele-bachmann</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: themobster</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/06/stephanopoulos-the-mobsters-veiled-threat-to-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1/#comment-5124</link>
		<dc:creator>themobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=13819#comment-5124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[have you seen worldmafiamadness.com OMG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you seen worldmafiamadness.com OMG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorhugo</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/06/stephanopoulos-the-mobsters-veiled-threat-to-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1/#comment-5123</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorhugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=13819#comment-5123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With that comment Stephanie was implyjoining the demonRATic throngs. They are committed to taking the heart out of the Bachmann candidacy by a vicious assault upon her like they mounted against Sarh Palin. His question was a virtual reminder of that in how he phrased it.

&quot;but are they prepared and are you prepared for the loss of privacy that comes with the president campaign? And is that something you are concerned about for them?&quot;

I submit that for a just announced &quot;female&quot; Republican candidate there can be no other motivation. I would challenge anyone to ascribe another &quot;reasonable&quot; motivation for such. What he really was doing was saying in a roundabout manner that you&#039;ve set up 23 little targets for us and we&#039;re going to take advantage of that fact. The &quot;and I know you want to shield them, but...&quot; was a gratuitous inference on his part and the icing on a foul demonRATic cake. Politics has always been the dirtiest game and the dems have always played it that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that comment Stephanie was implyjoining the demonRATic throngs. They are committed to taking the heart out of the Bachmann candidacy by a vicious assault upon her like they mounted against Sarh Palin. His question was a virtual reminder of that in how he phrased it.</p>
<p>&#8220;but are they prepared and are you prepared for the loss of privacy that comes with the president campaign? And is that something you are concerned about for them?&#8221;</p>
<p>I submit that for a just announced &#8220;female&#8221; Republican candidate there can be no other motivation. I would challenge anyone to ascribe another &#8220;reasonable&#8221; motivation for such. What he really was doing was saying in a roundabout manner that you&#8217;ve set up 23 little targets for us and we&#8217;re going to take advantage of that fact. The &#8220;and I know you want to shield them, but&#8230;&#8221; was a gratuitous inference on his part and the icing on a foul demonRATic cake. Politics has always been the dirtiest game and the dems have always played it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
