Conservative Daily News - The best news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..

“Bipartisan” doesn’t make S.679 right, just a two-partied wrong

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: ““Bipartisan” doesn’t make S.679 right, just a two-partied wrong”.

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (0)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. vonnise cobb says:

    This stinks. How can any Republican possible support senate bill 679 much less co-sponsor it?

    • Thanks for the comment, Vonnise.

      I’m convinced it’s one of several reasons:
      1) They didn’t read the descriptions of which posts would be included.
      Sure, there’s several ‘junior, non-policy making’ posts like Lamar mentioned, but there’s also a few troublesome positions: like the Chief Scientist for NOAA. Given the current trend of making legislative or executive changes by crying ‘climate change’, this is one post I want Senate to have some say in! I wrote an article detailing this particular appointment, available in the link above or here: http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/05/a-deeper-look-at-dangerous-streamlining-bill-s-679-chief-scientist-of-noaa/. The administrator of NOAA said this position will ‘DRIVE POLICY’.
      If they didn’t read the job titles, they need to be replaced for not doing their jobs.
      2) Maybe they didn’t think Obama would put someone in a post that would be detrimental to our country.
      If this is the case, they’re just not paying attention. Van Jones, Eric Holder, Valerie Jarrett, Anita Dunn, Cass Sunstein, and on and on and on .. the list of his associates that are not just left of center, but outright admirers and followers of socialist/marxist teachings and leaders is a testament to what kind of people we can expect from the current president.
      If they haven’t seen BHO’s trends, they need to be replaced for incompetence.
      Or sadly, 3) They don’t care or think it’s hopeless to buck the system. In which case, they need to be replaced for laying down on the job.
      Honestly, I can’t see how any American – Republican, Democrat, or other – could think to support such legislation. For those who support this bill because they think Obama is the greatest thing since sliced bread, how quickly they forget that their nightmare (another Bush or Reagan or even ultra-conservative President) could eventually take office. They wouldn’t dare give that president this kind of power. And we don’t dare sit by while the supporters say “it’s no big deal”.