Comments on: Senate Bill 679 A Blatant Act of Treason Against America

By: R. Mitchell

R. Mitchell — Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:23:53 +0000

That should be easy to do. I’ll see what we can put together. Thank you for the feedback.

By: SD

SD — Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:18:14 +0000

Where is the e-mail button? One can like on fb, tweet it, follow on RSS and add it on g+, but the article can not be forwarded to someone NOT social networking?!?!

I know a lot of conservatives that would love this information; would share it via e-mail; and probably become regular readers. None of that can happen without the ability to share/e-mail.

Now I have to spend a lot of time cleaning up the html and various codes to make it e-mail friendly. So much for the news…

By: miracle antioxidant product

miracle antioxidant product — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:51:37 +0000

We’re a group of volunteers and starting a brand new scheme in our community. Your web site provided us with useful information to work on. You’ve performed a formidable process and our entire community will likely be thankful to you.

By: stop biting nails

stop biting nails — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:12:29 +0000

obviously like your website but you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very bothersome to tell the reality however I’ll definitely come back again.

By: outside tv

outside tv — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:46:34 +0000

Great weblog right here! Also your web site rather a lot up fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink on your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

By: Discover more about Lucas

Discover more about Lucas — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:19:42 +0000

Hello my family member! I wish to say that this article is amazing, great written and come with almost all important infos. I’d like to see extra posts like this .

By: AZRanger

AZRanger — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:02:20 +0000

This is only the tip of the iceberg! I am from AZ, and both of the Senators from this state have shown themselves to be traitors to this Republic! It is coming down to the time when the people are going to do what must be done to restore gov’t of the people, by the people, and for the people! The narcissist in chief has been attempting to portray himself as a modern day Lincolnesque figure; and I think he has missed the boat. He is more like Wilson in his contempt for the precepts of individual liberties and the US Constitution.
Put food, firearms, ammo, and water away for the coming bad times! There will come a time when the Communists runnig this country are going to put the hammer down. And, if you are dependent on the government for sustenence, you will be unable to resist tyranny. Also, start training with others of a like mind! Join your local militia group, and prepare to defend your liberties!
In the Spirit of Liberty!

By: Stephen

Stephen — Tue, 10 May 2011 05:31:08 +0000

Why should this come as a surprise when just a few months after BO moved to Washington that a democrat from NY was quoted saying that he wants to make it where Obama can run for re-election until he dies of old age.

By: Frank Stephenson

Frank Stephenson — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:43:41 +0000

Why do people assume that because a government position exists it is necessary and should be permanent? Let’s get rid of all these agencies or whatever they are called so that no one has to be appointed to them by the executive or legislative branch. In other words, get rid of at least 90% of the federal government. Time for a rEVOLution. Ron Paul is not unelectable but the mainstream pols and pundits repeat it in hopes that the sheep will believe it. Keep listening to the sheepherders and get sheared.

By: Marc M

Marc M — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:10:22 +0000

These appointments are not inferior officers.

Look at the power these people are wielding… you sir, are the fool.

We’ll let the supreme court rule on this.. 5-4 of course since a liberal can’t do the right thing, ever.

By: robert vanderveer

robert vanderveer — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:51:23 +0000

i like that we hav true americans out there that take the time to let the people know just what the comi bastards are realy up to in our nations capital . i think we need a revalution to get rid of american comunists they are giving the country that our founding fathers built for us to the illeagle imgs and infringing on our freedoms. i say no more . lets take our country back from these marksists. why put off till tomarrow what we can eliminate today.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:36:56 +0000

Maybe animaltalker could brush up on his reading comprehension while at a community college and then he could explain his nonsensical comment ? I feel sorry for anyone that is shown to be lacking in knowledge trying to call others a fool, especially when they lack the ability to comprehend this article. As Maj Rick says, “inferior apointments” are mentioned. I have to ask animaltalker just what is supposed to be “inferior” about the damn Supreme court of the United States? That is included in the apointements these tyrants want to give the power to the POTUS to appoint unchecked . FYI Article II section 2 of the U S Constitution was written precisely to PREVENT the exec branch from obtaining too much power. So, yes anilmaltalker, you should keep your mouth shut so you dont look like the fool you are proven to be here, thank you.

Media matters misfits will never intimidate me with their horseshit , period. The facts are right here to see. That includes you animaltalker. Grow up, it is not my fault you are unqualified and unarmed in an intellectual discussion.

By: MAJ Rick

MAJ Rick — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:35:38 +0000

I’d agree with Animaltalker’s reasoning about the Presidential appointment of “inferior Officers” except that it doesn’t apply in this case. The czars are NOT inferior to the Cabinet secretaries. That’s always been one of the major complaints about them. This would be an excellent time set the record straight. Many Democrats objected rightly to so-called czars appointed by Republican presidents. If the so-called czar is performing functions and exercising responsibilities already delegated to a Cabinet department, the appointment is, in my opinion, unconstitutional — merely a rather obvious way of avoiding advise and consent.
This is a case where right-thinking Democrats need to work with their counterparts on the GOP side of the aisle to pass legislation condemning this kind of legislative sleight of hand. It could even be written as a “Sense of the Congress Resolution” to make it clear when the use of advise and consent is required as I’ve stated above. Done properly, it could also be written into House and Senate Rules of Procedure. Someone may wish to challenge it in court; but, that would only brink a welcome judicial review of the practice that I suggest. Whichever way the courts rule, we’ll be ahead of the present circumstances, where we’re operating by poorly supported assumptions mixed with bluff and bravado.

By: Animaltalker

Animaltalker — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:57:30 +0000

Maybe you should read your own quoted text from the constitution a little further

“but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone”

I believe passing a law in the Senate would be “Congress may by Law”

People argue as to whether it was Twain or Lincoln who said it but the sentiment is still a good one

“Better to keep one’s mouth shut and appear a fool than to open it and erase all doubt.”

By: ping pong

ping pong — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:44:22 +0000

not far at all ………..its coming ….stock it up ………