Conservative Daily News - The best news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..

Senate Bill 679 A Blatant Act of Treason Against America

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Senate Bill 679 A Blatant Act of Treason Against America”.

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (17)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. obviously like your website but you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very bothersome to tell the reality however I’ll definitely come back again.

  2. outside tv says:

    Great weblog right here! Also your web site rather a lot up fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink on your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  3. Hello my family member! I wish to say that this article is amazing, great written and come with almost all important infos. I’d like to see extra posts like this .

  4. AZRanger says:

    This is only the tip of the iceberg! I am from AZ, and both of the Senators from this state have shown themselves to be traitors to this Republic! It is coming down to the time when the people are going to do what must be done to restore gov’t of the people, by the people, and for the people! The narcissist in chief has been attempting to portray himself as a modern day Lincolnesque figure; and I think he has missed the boat. He is more like Wilson in his contempt for the precepts of individual liberties and the US Constitution.
    Put food, firearms, ammo, and water away for the coming bad times! There will come a time when the Communists runnig this country are going to put the hammer down. And, if you are dependent on the government for sustenence, you will be unable to resist tyranny. Also, start training with others of a like mind! Join your local militia group, and prepare to defend your liberties!
    In the Spirit of Liberty!

  5. Stephen says:

    Why should this come as a surprise when just a few months after BO moved to Washington that a democrat from NY was quoted saying that he wants to make it where Obama can run for re-election until he dies of old age.

  6. Frank Stephenson says:

    Why do people assume that because a government position exists it is necessary and should be permanent? Let’s get rid of all these agencies or whatever they are called so that no one has to be appointed to them by the executive or legislative branch. In other words, get rid of at least 90% of the federal government. Time for a rEVOLution. Ron Paul is not unelectable but the mainstream pols and pundits repeat it in hopes that the sheep will believe it. Keep listening to the sheepherders and get sheared.

  7. robert vanderveer says:

    i like that we hav true americans out there that take the time to let the people know just what the comi bastards are realy up to in our nations capital . i think we need a revalution to get rid of american comunists they are giving the country that our founding fathers built for us to the illeagle imgs and infringing on our freedoms. i say no more . lets take our country back from these marksists. why put off till tomarrow what we can eliminate today.

  8. Animaltalker says:

    Maybe you should read your own quoted text from the constitution a little further

    “but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone”

    I believe passing a law in the Senate would be “Congress may by Law”

    People argue as to whether it was Twain or Lincoln who said it but the sentiment is still a good one

    “Better to keep one’s mouth shut and appear a fool than to open it and erase all doubt.”

    • MAJ Rick says:

      I’d agree with Animaltalker’s reasoning about the Presidential appointment of “inferior Officers” except that it doesn’t apply in this case. The czars are NOT inferior to the Cabinet secretaries. That’s always been one of the major complaints about them. This would be an excellent time set the record straight. Many Democrats objected rightly to so-called czars appointed by Republican presidents. If the so-called czar is performing functions and exercising responsibilities already delegated to a Cabinet department, the appointment is, in my opinion, unconstitutional — merely a rather obvious way of avoiding advise and consent.
      This is a case where right-thinking Democrats need to work with their counterparts on the GOP side of the aisle to pass legislation condemning this kind of legislative sleight of hand. It could even be written as a “Sense of the Congress Resolution” to make it clear when the use of advise and consent is required as I’ve stated above. Done properly, it could also be written into House and Senate Rules of Procedure. Someone may wish to challenge it in court; but, that would only brink a welcome judicial review of the practice that I suggest. Whichever way the courts rule, we’ll be ahead of the present circumstances, where we’re operating by poorly supported assumptions mixed with bluff and bravado.

    • Daniel says:

      Maybe animaltalker could brush up on his reading comprehension while at a community college and then he could explain his nonsensical comment ? I feel sorry for anyone that is shown to be lacking in knowledge trying to call others a fool, especially when they lack the ability to comprehend this article. As Maj Rick says, “inferior apointments” are mentioned. I have to ask animaltalker just what is supposed to be “inferior” about the damn Supreme court of the United States? That is included in the apointements these tyrants want to give the power to the POTUS to appoint unchecked . FYI Article II section 2 of the U S Constitution was written precisely to PREVENT the exec branch from obtaining too much power. So, yes anilmaltalker, you should keep your mouth shut so you dont look like the fool you are proven to be here, thank you.

      Media matters misfits will never intimidate me with their horseshit , period. The facts are right here to see. That includes you animaltalker. Grow up, it is not my fault you are unqualified and unarmed in an intellectual discussion.

    • Marc M says:

      These appointments are not inferior officers.

      Look at the power these people are wielding… you sir, are the fool.

      We’ll let the supreme court rule on this.. 5-4 of course since a liberal can’t do the right thing, ever.

  9. Loral Orow says:

    I can’t help but wonder how much further this administration is going to push the people until the revolution begins. Our Founders worked hard to give us a country based of fairness and one by one this administration has removed that.
    Do we just sit here & let it keep happening as the Germans did when Hitler was doing the same things? Something has to give pretty soon or it will be too late!

  10. This is an Outline of a hand written Monroe County Indiana City of Bloomington Government a $33 million Tort Claim
    Filed on 01-04-2011,

    Updates will be made on
    http://www.FaceBook.com

    http://Writing.Com/authors/epistemology ,

    http://storywrite.com/ ,

    on January 01- Day 04 2011, a $33 million Dollar Tort Claim to Suit City of Bloomington Monroe County Indiana Elected & Appointed for Direct Constitutional Contempt. For the Unconstitutional Restraint of 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech & Redress of Grievance. Taxation without representation is tyranny! So Out lined in the rules of Public Comment So passed & unconstitutionally upheld.

    Views In Question to be Challenged like Rules of Public Comment Rule Number 5, Rule Number 1. Rule Number 2, 6 Out lined below!
    http://bloomington.in.gov/media/media/application/pdf/7507.pdf

    In the this tort Claim Notes was made to address the Treasonous views of the city of Bloomington Indiana to insight We the people backs a boy cot of Arizona’s right of self defense to secure the unsecured
    Borders,to Hault the Action of Known threat to ward off threats to Legal Americans! They Held no Town Hall back In may 17 2010 before as such!

    I sigh the Gibbons v. Ogden 9 Wheaton 1 1824 case,
    Gibbons V. Ogden} 9 Wheaton 1 (1824). Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall, Upholds Only Congress can regulate Inter States Commerce

    It has been said that they were sovereign, {“The States”} were completely independent, and were connected with each other only by a “League”!
    The States Tax System was the only one force able with or with out a War being fought on United States Soil, The federal system was to be voluntary unless a war was so being fought on “United States Soil” Both views was for to pay for again the Common defense to protect the United States or the Common “League” in form of the National defense leads by the executive Branch of Government common defense League. From threats! And for the over All running of A Government for the Well being of the people
    To rejects Such is Treason Be so I sight the Boy Cots Of Arizona’s Sighted By Obama and those that back Him!

    Open Meetings Laws in Indiana

    http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/2010/title5/ar14/ch1.5.html

    Open Meetings Laws in Indiana
    http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/open-meetings-laws-indiana

    IC 5-14-1.5-3
    Open meetings; secret ballot votes; member participating by electronic means of communication
    Sec. 3. (a) Except as provided in section 6.1 of this chapter, all meetings of the governing bodies of public agencies must be open at all times for the purpose of permitting members of the public to observe and record them.
    (b) A secret ballot vote may not be taken at a meeting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation

    Laws Sighted: {United States Title 42 United States Code Section 1983} & the International Maritime Jurisdiction http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001983—-000-.html
    Its time to Clean House Vote them out Suit them out Dis Bare them
    In My view Mayor Mark Kruzan , Isabel Piedmont Smith President district V rep, Andy Ruff Vice President , Parliamentarian district 3 Rep. Mike Satterfield, At-Large Rep. Tim Mayer, At- Large Rep. Susan Sandberg , District 1 Rep Chris Sturbaum, District Rep IV. Dave Rollo , District Rep VI. Steve Volm, City Clerk Regina Moore, for backing such.

    City of Bloomington President district V rep, other work Place
    Department Administrator
    Isabel Piedmont-Smith
    Ballantine Hall 642A
    (812) 855-5458
    ipiedmon @indiana.edu

    Phone (812) 855-1952
    Website http://www.indiana.edu/~frithome/

    They Should be Voted and or suited out for not seeking to get the vote of we the people before Acting to sight “ We The People” The “League “ Boycott Arizona, I mean come on at least a Town Hall meeting should have took place, that did not. But because of such rules of public comment like # 5 and the Statement made as such the constitution does not give us such right to speak at town hall meeting let alone are we let to have dialog and is such part of the reason for the Tort Claim filed.