Big L, little l : L(i)bertarian Decoded

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Big L, little l : L(i)bertarian Decoded”.

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

2 thoughts on “Big L, little l : L(i)bertarian Decoded

  1. ◄Dave►

    Most interesting, Michelle. I have been calling myself a small (L) libertarian for many years, for what appears to be the opposite of your distinctions. I consider the Libertarian Party to be the uncompromising dogmatists, so involved in internecine squabbling that it will never be an effective force in American politics. Trying to organize such staunch individualists is akin to herding cats. I attended one meeting about 15 years ago and never went back.

    I know pragmatism is anathema to libertarianism; but I am unwilling to allow my ideals to prevent me from influencing and making common cause with conservatives, in our existential battle with the Marxists and Jihadists, who wish to enslave me. E.g. I think drugs should be legal for many very good reasons; but I suppose that since I don’t use them, and understand the irrational fear conservatives have for their potential pernicious effect on their children, I am more than willing to postpone that issue for a later time.

    This permits me to propagate ideas about Liberty, in minds that otherwise slam shut at the mention of the Libertarian Party or its candidates. Perhaps incorrectly, but nonetheless effectively in discourse with conservatives, I equate small (L) libertarians with most of our Founding Fathers. This resonates with them, and over the last few years I have perceived a remarkable acceptance of libertarian thinking by conservatives becoming Constitutionalists.

    To me, that is a huge step in the right direction, which the Libertarian Party itself does not seem to deserve much credit. I have long said that if the drug issue is removed from the table, I can make a libertarian out of most conservatives in five minutes of conversation. Anecdotal evidence has confirmed that proposition to my satisfaction in the past few years. ◄Dave►

  2. James Fish

    Right on Michelle. I find myself clooser to the big L than the little l. Interesting how misunderstood we libertarians are. I’m glad you wrote this and hope more can understand us.

Comments are closed.