NATO Takes Over in Libyan Civil War. Excuse me?

By | March 25, 2011

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “NATO Takes Over in Libyan Civil War. Excuse me?”.

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

9 thoughts on “NATO Takes Over in Libyan Civil War. Excuse me?

  1. Diane Crouse

    The progressive leftist, A.K.A, Socialist Marxists, can not see the writing on the wall. They are blinded by their firm belief in their Dear Leaders genus and magnetic personality to find any fault in his actions. It matters not, that Obama treats the Constitution with disregard. For these people do not hold these things in there hearts as the principles that forged this Nation. To them these are mere writings of old white men disgruntled with the English ruling class. It is nothing more then a Document that can be ignored if it suits the purpose of the leader at that moment. There are no absolutes, in this mindset. Logic is lost on emotions and feelings. All decisions can be made on a whim, history has no value in evaluating an outcome. If things turn out bad, one can always blame the unforeseen circumstances, or others that may have advised in the process. That is why we are in real danger of destruction from within.

  2. Bernard J. Berg

    Aggression against Libya is off limits, unlike Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries (all of Latin America) which are thoroughly within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization purview. Comrade B P.S. typo error on “countries”

    1. Daniel (twitter: @Mirac777) Post author

      You are correct Comrade B- Bush went to Congress before both Iraq and Afghan which was AFTER the USA was attacked. As mentioned above, just when did Libya attack any country ? Answer that one and folks just might think you have a valid point here, otherwise it is known as trollling.

  3. Bernard J. Berg

    Aggression against Libya is off limits, unlike Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other counries (all of Latin America) which are thoroughly within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization purview. Comrade B

  4. Amber

    And to the other genius who commented on this story, you can impeach a president but no gov’t official can be charged with anything until and IF they are expunged from office. Impeachment is like shaking your finger at a child and saying, “No no! Bad!” Whoopdie freaking doo.

    1. LiberalEducator

      ONE WORD Slick, Constitution, which mandates that Congress will be consulted and all aspects of any military action will be explained, such as the end goal. Your supposed proof carries no weight, try reading it.

      WWHOOPS< ley's see who is the Genuis, the one who wrote this article or the one using liberal ideology to try to twist the facts around: One of thjem actually knows how to read and found the following:

      From AMBERS link:S1542:
      The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.

      Try again .

    1. LiberalEducator

      As a matter of fact Impeachment is the house trial that , when enough evidence is presented about a violation of the Constitution and Obama’s sworn Oath to defend it, it can lead to criminal charges.Impeachment also can mean kicked out of office disgracefully and open the door to furture charges. I,m not a law student, just a relentless researcher.
      Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity and the outcome of which, depending on the country, can lead to the removal of that official from office or ***other punishment.*** . Although the House vote is to lay charges to start the process. In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to “The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States” who may only be impeached and removed for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors”.

      An impeachable offense is whatever a majority (which is now Republican held) of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history. What part of Obama engaging in the Libya civil war do you not understand here? What part of Libya did not attack any NATO country, therefor it is illegal for NATO to wage a war on Libya do you not understand?

  5. Daniel (twitter: @Mirac777) Post author

    NATO is NOT the U.N peacekeeping force! This is not the business of the United States of America! Impeach Obama for entering into an illegal war and not going to Congress first, as the Constitution mandates!

Comments are closed.