<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gov. Purdue Vetoes Bill That Would Save NC $540 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/02/gov-purdue-vetoes-bill-that-would-save-nc-540-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/02/gov-purdue-vetoes-bill-that-would-save-nc-540-million/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gov-purdue-vetoes-bill-that-would-save-nc-540-million</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R.</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/02/gov-purdue-vetoes-bill-that-would-save-nc-540-million/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>John R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=6867#comment-5308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov.Christie of NJ has done a good job dealing with Democrats who control both houses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov.Christie of NJ has done a good job dealing with Democrats who control both houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/02/gov-purdue-vetoes-bill-that-would-save-nc-540-million/comment-page-1/#comment-5307</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=6867#comment-5307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic Governor Purdue is still using her ex-husband name even though she is remarried. Must be a political move there. Also, big money crony-capitalists need to be paid back for getting her elected as we see here:

    On October 22, 2010, Perdue revealed that her 2008 campaign is under State and Federal investigation. Authorities are looking into 41 confirmed private flights she took going back to 2005. Her campaign did not report the flights until last year. The State Board of Elections in August fined Perdue&#039;s campaign $30,000 for the flights aboard campaign donors&#039; planes but concluded that the Perdue Committee did not intentionally violate the law. Perdue and representatives of her campaign have maintained that there was never any intent to conceal the flights, some of which might have violated state limits on contributions to candidates. Rather, they have said, the campaign had &quot;a flawed system for recording flights,&quot; and the trips weren&#039;t discovered until an audit of campaign records was conducted last year.

   Nothing to see here folks move on, after all she is a Democrat and they are above the law today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Governor Purdue is still using her ex-husband name even though she is remarried. Must be a political move there. Also, big money crony-capitalists need to be paid back for getting her elected as we see here:</p>
<p>    On October 22, 2010, Perdue revealed that her 2008 campaign is under State and Federal investigation. Authorities are looking into 41 confirmed private flights she took going back to 2005. Her campaign did not report the flights until last year. The State Board of Elections in August fined Perdue&#8217;s campaign $30,000 for the flights aboard campaign donors&#8217; planes but concluded that the Perdue Committee did not intentionally violate the law. Perdue and representatives of her campaign have maintained that there was never any intent to conceal the flights, some of which might have violated state limits on contributions to candidates. Rather, they have said, the campaign had &#8220;a flawed system for recording flights,&#8221; and the trips weren&#8217;t discovered until an audit of campaign records was conducted last year.</p>
<p>   Nothing to see here folks move on, after all she is a Democrat and they are above the law today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
